[1]冯晓英,郑勤华,陈鹏宇.学习分析视角下在线认知水平的评价模型研究[J].远程教育杂志,2016,(06):039-45.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2016.06.005]
　Feng Xiaoying,Zheng Qinhua,Chen Pengyu.Research on the Evaluation Model of Online Cognitive Level from the perspective of Learning Analysis[J].Distance Education Journal,2016,(06):039-45.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2016.06.005]
点击复制

学习分析视角下在线认知水平的评价模型研究()
分享到：

《远程教育杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年06期
页码:
039-45
栏目:
学习新论
出版日期:
2016-11-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Evaluation Model of Online Cognitive Level from the perspective of Learning Analysis
作者:
冯晓英； 郑勤华； 陈鹏宇
北京师范大学 远程教育研究中心，北京 100875
Author(s):
Feng Xiaoying； Zheng Qinhua； Chen Pengyu
Distance Education Research Center, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
关键词:
在线学习; 形成性评价; 学习分析; 认知能力
Keywords:
Online learning;  Formative assessment;  Learning analysis;  Cognitive ability
分类号:
G420
DOI:
10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2016.06.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
学习过程评价是在线教学的重要环节。然而，目前学习过程评价存在三个困难：一是哪些指标能够反映在线学习的质量？二是如何及时了解在线学习过程中学习者的认知水平？三是对于学生数量较大的在线课程，是否能够实现对在线认知水平的自动评价？为此，需要以学习分析的思路，探索在线学习行为与在线认知水平之间的关系，确认能够表征在线认知能力的形成性评价指标，并尝试构建在线认知水平评价的学习分析模型。研究的对象为基于Moodle平台的一门纯网络课程，主要采用了内容分析法、社会网络分析法等方法对自变量和因变量数据进行编码和量化，分析对象包括551个样本的行为数据及2459条讨论帖，并采用相关分析和多重线性回归进行数据分析。通过研究发现：（1）个体行为、交互行为、社会网络属性等三个维度的13个学习行为指标与在线认知水平显著相关；（2）“同伴回复”、“阅读帖子”、“发布帖子”等三个行为变量被纳入到表征认知能力的回归模型中，适合作为在线学习过程性评价的评价指标；（3）研究初步构建了在线认知水平的评价模型。基于研究结果，分别对用户画像类学习分析工具和评价类学习分析工具的设计与应用进行了讨论，以期为教师开展在线学习的过程性评价提供理论依据，为学习分析工具的设计与应用提供理论参考。
Abstract:
The evaluation of learning process is an important part of online teaching. However, there are three kinds of difficulty in the evaluation of learning process: Firstly, what indicators can reflect the quality of online learning? Secondly, how to timely understand the cognitive level of learners in the online learning process? Thirdly, whether online courses with a larger number of students can realize the automatic evaluation of online cognitive level? The study employed the method of learning analysis to explore the relationship between online learning behavior and online cognitive level. It confirmed the formative evaluation indicators that could be used to characterize online cognitive ability, and tried to construct the learning analysis model of online cognitive level evaluation. The research object was a pure network course based on Moodle platform. This research mainly adopted the methods of content analysis and social network analysis to code and analyze the independent variables data and the dependent variable data, including the behavioral data of 551 samples and 2459 discussion posts. In addition, this study used correlation analysis and multiple linear regression to analyze the data. The results were as follows: Firstly, 13 learning behavior indicators from the three dimensions of individual behavior, interaction behavior and social network attribute were significantly correlated with online cognitive level. Secondly, three behavioral variables, such as peer response, reading post and making a post, were included in the regression model of cognitive ability, which were suitable as the evaluation indicators of online learning process evaluation. Thirdly, a preliminary evaluation model of online cognitive level was constructed in this study. Finally, the author discussed the design and application of learning analysis tool, including the user portrait class and evaluation class. We hope that the results of this study can provide a theoretical basis for online learning process evaluation, and also provide a theoretical reference for the design and application of learning analysis tools.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵建华 孔 晶.在线讨论分析编码表的类型及应用[J].远程教育杂志,2015,(02):011.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2015.02.002]
　Zhao Jianhua& Kong Jing.Coding Schemes of Online Discussion Analysis: Categories and Utilization[J].Distance Education Journal,2015,(06):011.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2015.02.002]
[2]温 蕴,盛群力,祝智力.引领式在线学习在电大教学中的应用研究——基于综合学习设计模式[J].远程教育杂志,2014,(06):078.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2014.06.010]
　Wen Yun,Sheng Qunli,Zhu Zhili.Research on Application of Guiding e-Learning into Teaching in Radio & TV University: Based on Design Model of Comprehensive Learning[J].Distance Education Journal,2014,(06):078.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2014.06.010]
[3]王竹立.微课勿重走“课内整合”老路——对微课应用的再思考[J].远程教育杂志,2014,(05):034.
　Wang Zhuli.Do Not Repeat the Mistakes of “Integration of Information Technology into Classroom”: Reconsideration on the Application of Micro-lesson[J].Distance Education Journal,2014,(06):034.
[4]夏文菁,张剑平.基于网络的对话式教学交互及其工具运用[J].远程教育杂志,2014,(04):030.
　Xia Wenjing,Zhang Jianping.Instructional Interaction and Tool Utilization in Web-based Dialogue Teaching[J].Distance Education Journal,2014,(06):030.
[5]姜淑慧.MOOCs与SPOCs：在线课程发展的不同路径与共同问题[J].远程教育杂志,2014,(04):106.
　Jiang Shuhui.MOOCs and SPOCs: The Different Paths and Common Problems of the Online Course Development[J].Distance Education Journal,2014,(06):106.
[6]王小雪,陈小珺,崔国强,等.庆祝3.0：设计、学习与社会群体——从2011 AECT年会审视教育技术的现状与发展[J].远程教育杂志,2012,(01):003.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2012.01.006]
　Wang Xiaoxue,Chen Xiaojun,Cui Guoqiang,et al.The State and Development Trends of Educational Technology in the USA：Commenting on 2011 AECT International Convention[J].Distance Education Journal,2012,(06):003.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2012.01.006]
[7]黄德群.基于高校网络教学平台的混合学习模式应用研究[J].远程教育杂志,2013,(03):064.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2013.03.010]
　Huang Dequn.Application Study on Blended Learning Based on Network Education Platform in Universities[J].Distance Education Journal,2013,(06):064.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2013.03.010]
[8][美]Jessica Li,王辞晓,吴峰.成人在线学习自我效能感量表编制及测量[J].远程教育杂志,2015,(06):047.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2015.06.007]
　Jessica Li,Chixiao Wang,Feng Wu.Measuring Adult Online Learning Self-Efficacy[J].Distance Education Journal,2015,(06):047.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2015.06.007]
[9]田 阳,冯 锐.在线学习社区中的社交学习策略研究[J].远程教育杂志,2016,(01):037.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2016.01.004]
　Tian Yang,Feng Rui.Social Learning Strategies of Online Learning Community[J].Distance Education Journal,2016,(06):037.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2016.01.004]
[10]马秀麟,毛 荷,王翠霞.从MOOC到SPOC：两种在线学习模式成效的实证研究[J].远程教育杂志,2016,(04):043.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2016.04.006]
　Ma Xiulin,Mao He,Wang Cuixia.From MOOC to SPOC: An Empirical Study on the Effect of Two Kinds of Online Learning Mode[J].Distance Education Journal,2016,(06):043.[doi:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2016.04.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：本文系中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助“基于学习分析技术的在线交互质量评价的研究”（课题编号：310422101）研究成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-11-11